Verdict: how to choose
- Choose NetNut if: your targets require ISP residential IPs (ad verification, brand monitoring on social platforms, targets that block datacenter ranges) or you need long-session stability measured in hours.
- Choose Rayobyte if: your targets are non-aggressive (travel, classified, B2B data) and you want maximum throughput and minimum cost per request via datacenter IPs.
These two providers serve fundamentally different proxy use cases. Comparing them is like comparing apples to oranges — the right choice depends entirely on your target sites.
Comparison table
| Metric | NetNut | Rayobyte |
|---|---|---|
| Primary type | ISP residential | Datacenter |
| Success rate (social/ad targets) | measuring | measuring |
| Success rate (standard targets) | measuring | measuring |
| Avg latency | measuring ms | measuring ms |
| Pool size | 85M+ IPs | 300K+ DC IPs |
| Pricing | $7.00/GB residential | $1.98/IP/month DC |
| Free trial | 7-day (no CC) | 100 free DC IPs |
| Geo coverage | 180+ countries | 15+ countries (DC) |
Performance deep-dive
NetNut’s advantage: ISP proxies look like real broadband connections to target sites. On ad platforms, social media, and any target that aggressively filters datacenter IP ranges, NetNut succeeds where Rayobyte will fail or see high block rates.
Rayobyte’s advantage: Datacenter latency is 2–5x faster than any residential or ISP proxy. Throughput per dollar is much higher. For travel pricing APIs, news sites, government databases, and classified listings that don’t run anti-bot, Rayobyte is the economic choice.
Pricing winner
Incomparable — different billing models. NetNut at $7.00/GB works for moderate volume. Rayobyte at $1.98/IP/month works for high-throughput DC tasks.
Best by use case
| Use case | Recommendation | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Ad verification | NetNut | ISP IPs are authentic for ad platform checks |
| Brand protection | NetNut | Long sessions monitor brand presence reliably |
| Travel data | Rayobyte | DC speed + low blocking on travel APIs |
| Web scraping (standard) | Rayobyte | Cost efficiency on non-aggressive targets |
| Social media | NetNut | ISP routing bypasses mobile/social anti-bot |
FAQ
Can I use Rayobyte for Instagram data? Instagram aggressively blocks datacenter IPs. Rayobyte will have poor success rates on Instagram. Use NetNut’s ISP proxies or SOAX’s mobile proxies instead. See social media guide.
What targets work well with Rayobyte? Travel booking sites, job boards, real estate listings, B2B databases, and government data portals. These sites rarely implement aggressive anti-bot that specifically blocks datacenter ranges.
Does NetNut work for e-commerce scraping? Yes, but at $7/GB ISP pricing it’s more expensive than Smartproxy or Decodo for the same task. NetNut shines on specifically ISP-required targets, not generic e-commerce. See web scraping guide.
This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by an editor. As of 2026-05-31. Legitimate use only.